In this article, Shalin Arthwan, Partner C&S Partners examines the persistent challenge posed by conflicting judgments delivered by coordinate benches of the Supreme Court and High Courts in India. Through a doctrinal analysis of judicial discipline, the piece explains the constitutional and institutional necessity for benches of equal strength to follow earlier coordinate‑bench decisions, and the limited circumstances under which deviation is permissible. The article highlights how inconsistent rulings undermine legal certainty, burden litigants, and complicate the administration of justice. By surveying key precedents and judicial observations, Shalin underscores the judiciary’s responsibility to maintain coherence in the law and advocates for a more structured approach, such as timely reference to larger benches, to resolve interpretational conflicts. The article ultimately calls for strengthened internal judicial discipline to preserve the integrity and predictability of India’s legal system.
The original article can be accessed here